NASCAR has allegedly withdrawn its charter offer to Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing amidst a contentious legal dispute. Both teams have claimed that NASCAR linked the approval of FRM’s charter purchase from Stewart-Haas Racing to the withdrawal of their antitrust lawsuits. The unfolding dispute is now being handled in the U.S. District Court of Western North Carolina.
The crux of the legal battle involves accusations from FRM and 23XI Racing, which argue that NASCAR’s charter system and revenue-sharing agreements constitute anti-competitive practices. The lawsuit contends that such practices harm the financial viability of teams. In affidavits submitted to the court, Jerry Freeze, FRM’s General Manager, alleged:
“Specifically, NASCAR informed us that it would not approve the [charter] transfer unless we agreed to drop our current antitrust lawsuit against them,” he said via NBC Sports.
These serious allegations point towards a retaliatory stance on NASCAR’s part.
James Gilbert/Getty Images
In September, both teams refused to sign NASCAR’s revenue-sharing agreement, which was accepted by 13 other teams. Michael Jordan, co-owner of 23XI Racing, stated that the legal challenge is pursued for the benefit of all teams involved in NASCAR. However, NASCAR’s response was rapid, with their objection to the charter transfer causing suspected irreparable harm to the involved teams.
“NASCAR informed us on December 5, 2024, that it objected to the transfer and would not approve it, in contrast to the previous oral approval for the transfer confirmed by Phelps before we filed the lawsuit. NASCAR made it clear that the reason it was now changing course and objecting to the transfer is because NASCAR is insisting that we drop the lawsuit and antitrust claims against it as a condition of being approved.”
The lawsuit also challenges the very system that guarantees certain teams—a feature introduced in 2016—spots in each NASCAR Cup Series event. NASCAR currently operates with 36 chartered teams, and plans to restructure to 32 chartered teams with eight open slots by 2025. This proposed change adds urgency to the legal proceedings, as it affects 23XI and FRM’s ambitions to expand from two-car teams to three cars.
Steve Lauletta, President of 23XI Racing, has rejected NASCAR’s claims of coordinated attempts to manipulate the charter system as “completely false.” In defending their stance, Lauletta said:
“23XI exists to compete at the highest level of stock car racing, striving to become the best team it can be. But that ambition can only be pursued within NASCAR, which has monopolized the market as the sole top-tier circuit for stock car racing.”
The implication is that NASCAR’s alleged monopoly leaves teams with limited options or alternatives within the sport.
The broader context of the dispute includes the negotiation of new revenue-sharing terms. The teams have pushed back against a proposed seven-year renewal of existing charters, advocating instead for permanent charters and a more equitable distribution of NASCAR’s revenue. Their demands include a 45% share of traditional media revenue and 33% of new revenue, alongside more significant governance power. NASCAR’s reluctance to adjust to these demands has resulted in a deepening rift between the organization and some of its teams.